Already a member?
Sign in
- EasyEdit
Edit tags
Email page-
(what's this?What are these tools?
People just like you can add or edit the content on this site. If you want to try editing, but aren't ready to add to this site, try our demo area.
Read more about editing pages at Wetpaint Central.
)
Colorado's Mileage Legislation
Proposed Frequent Flyer Bill: Cooked Before Being Served
As many of you know, I live in Colorado, famous for its water that is used to brew Coors beer. But after recent events, I’m thinking there must be something in that water. Sen. Bob Hagedorn, D-Aurora and Rep. Sara Gagliardi, D-Arvada, introduced Colorado Senate bill 243 that would have changed the mileage expiration policies of the state’s frequent flyer programs.
That’s good. I’m all for reasonable things to benefit members of these programs. The new bill would prevent miles that are earned through using a credit card or an online travel agency from expiring. The bill specifically states that “no frequent flyer mileage awarded or accumulated in connection with the issuance of a credit card to or the utilization of an online travel agency by a consumer shall be subject to expiration or revocation by the commercial airline awarding that mileage.”
Because of federal airline deregulation in the late 1970s, states aren’t allowed to regulate airline rates, routes or service, which is why Hagedorn and Gagliardi attempted to skirt that law by only dealing with miles accumulated with airline credit cards or through Web-based travel agencies.
The sponsors of the bill say they introduced it because of “persistent constituent complaints” that they were losing frequent flyer miles due to changing airline rules and restrictions. I added my support towards killing the bill and thankfully, it was DOA. As noted, I’m all for members’ rights, but did not feel it worth the risk that airlines might cut off Colorado consumers from their programs, in order to avoid the hassle of doing business here. I tell you, it’s the water.
Latest page update: made by jimglab
, Apr 21 2007, 11:10 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by jimglab
277 words added
view changes
- complete history)
277 words added
view changes
- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
(Edit tags)
More Info: links to this page
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | Doesn't the government have better things to do? | 0 | May 10 2007, 8:06 AM EDT by Anonymous | |
|
|
Thread started: May 10 2007, 8:06 AM EDT
Watch
It seems silly (and dangerous) that legislators are attempting to regulate something that the market is fully capable of regulating itself. Typical politicians' stunt to "give" constituents something without concern for principle.
Do you find this valuable?
Keyword tags: None
(edit keyword tags)
|
|||
